Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 0:35:50 GMT -8
Were raised to believe would save our lives, but also nearly ended them. Government and the auto industry protect men, but kill or seriously harm the other 50% of the population Automotive design regulators have known for more than 40 years that women's internal structures put them at greater risk than men. In 1980, based on the recommendation of a team of researchers at the University of Michigan, the NHSTA prepared to create a family of dolls that would have included a true female representation. When the Reagan administration came to power in 1981, the agency's budget was drastically reduced along with many other cuts to the federal government; the exact female doll was a victim of those cuts. Sexism in automotive design? Industry data shows that part of the reason women are at higher risk than men is that women tend to drive smaller, lighter vehicles, while men gravitate toward larger cars and trucks. The industry knows that heavy passenger trucks put women at tremendous risk; A 1988 Oxford University study found that the "main determinant of death is the weight of the vehicle in question.
Heavy vehicles are also a greater threat to pedestrians than small cars, and pedestrians are more likely to be women or people of color. But the motor vehicle industry, free from government regulations, continues to grow and make cars more lethal, putting more women's lives at risk for men's enjoyment and their own benefit. Sexism in automotive design is just one example of how women are often erased from critical design decisions. In the book Invisible Women by Carolina Criado Pérez, she tells us how countless products, from smartphones to stoves, are developed without taking women into account. Is it another omission? or USA Phone Number is it an intentional exclusion. The people sitting around the table in most transportation, engineering and automotive conversations are men. This intentional or ignored omission affects the lives of women and society on a similar scale: it is violent, it minimizes and, when it comes to cars, it is killing women.
Not everything is lost The House INVEST in America Act calls for an updated and more equitable dummy implementation of the dummies than tested in each seat. Bringing the New Car Evaluation Program into this century is an objective that can help make women's needs and requirements visible. With the implementation of this law, some countries have managed to advance in an inclusive and gender equitable automotive design. The NCAPs of Europe, Japan and China were originally modeled on those of the United States. However, they haven't been hurt by persistent negligence, choosing to use more sensitive mannequins rather than offering an inflated five stars to everyone. While national pride, innovation, and the desire to be a more equitable society may still be reason enough, the inability of American-made cars to meet international safety standards may ultimately make them impossible.
Heavy vehicles are also a greater threat to pedestrians than small cars, and pedestrians are more likely to be women or people of color. But the motor vehicle industry, free from government regulations, continues to grow and make cars more lethal, putting more women's lives at risk for men's enjoyment and their own benefit. Sexism in automotive design is just one example of how women are often erased from critical design decisions. In the book Invisible Women by Carolina Criado Pérez, she tells us how countless products, from smartphones to stoves, are developed without taking women into account. Is it another omission? or USA Phone Number is it an intentional exclusion. The people sitting around the table in most transportation, engineering and automotive conversations are men. This intentional or ignored omission affects the lives of women and society on a similar scale: it is violent, it minimizes and, when it comes to cars, it is killing women.
Not everything is lost The House INVEST in America Act calls for an updated and more equitable dummy implementation of the dummies than tested in each seat. Bringing the New Car Evaluation Program into this century is an objective that can help make women's needs and requirements visible. With the implementation of this law, some countries have managed to advance in an inclusive and gender equitable automotive design. The NCAPs of Europe, Japan and China were originally modeled on those of the United States. However, they haven't been hurt by persistent negligence, choosing to use more sensitive mannequins rather than offering an inflated five stars to everyone. While national pride, innovation, and the desire to be a more equitable society may still be reason enough, the inability of American-made cars to meet international safety standards may ultimately make them impossible.