Post by account_disabled on Feb 19, 2024 23:13:59 GMT -8
I have not heard or read Yolanda Diaz identify with Mélenchon's project, but I have heard some leaders of some of the political formations who say they support what is now beginning with her leadership as the “ SUMAR Association ” and its proposal to “ listen .” I could therefore have added “just in case” to the title. And, just in case, I find it useful to consider the proposals of the French “New Popular Union” led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon in the French legislative elections called for next June and with its “Programme partagé de gouvernement of the Nouvelle Union populaire écologique et sociale as well as his assessment of the recent presidential elections in which he came within a few votes of Marine Le Pen: “ Les 3 blocs et l'avenir de l'Union Populaire “Add” well: good additions and correct results It is easy to agree with much of both documents. They are in fact, although not only, the sum of all the good wishes of world progress.
However, there are some points that draw attention and that, after detailed consideration, lead to disagreement, not always about the proposal, but above all about how to Australia Phone Number achieve it in its relationship with the political and social action that would be required (and that they seem to forget). before, during and after the elections. Contents and lack that, in summary, would indicate that Mélenchon is not really planning to govern in today's France, in today's world, but rather to obtain the maximum number of deputies from the sum of organizations that are presented in the same electoral proposal, at the same time, Already in the same program, they express different, even contradictory, programmatic proposals on some non-secondary points. Taking this consideration to the limit, a first conclusion from both documents is that if Mélenchon's proposal achieved a parliamentary basis for him to.
Become prime minister (which is not synonymous with being able to “govern” applying his program), it could be a serious defeat of the French progressive option because from its approaches there are very few possibilities of achieving the application of its electoral proposals, which would result in greater citizen disappointment with the advance of the anti-politics that nourishes the fascist proposals. Let us therefore go to both documents, particularly to the “Programme” of chapters, in relation to the points on which I want to express doubts or disagreements, for what is said and for what is not said, as well as for the specific discrepancies expressed. for each organization that makes up the French coalition. Some issues, such as retirement at age 60, are raised without a proposal for a profound tax reform that would allow their application. Others point to a serious ignorance of the meaning of social relations (of “class struggle”), as could be implied by establishing by law (not by agreement resulting from collective bargaining and the consequent social mobilization) various issues: the right to veto of the works council for employment regulation files, the 35-hour work week (through the.
However, there are some points that draw attention and that, after detailed consideration, lead to disagreement, not always about the proposal, but above all about how to Australia Phone Number achieve it in its relationship with the political and social action that would be required (and that they seem to forget). before, during and after the elections. Contents and lack that, in summary, would indicate that Mélenchon is not really planning to govern in today's France, in today's world, but rather to obtain the maximum number of deputies from the sum of organizations that are presented in the same electoral proposal, at the same time, Already in the same program, they express different, even contradictory, programmatic proposals on some non-secondary points. Taking this consideration to the limit, a first conclusion from both documents is that if Mélenchon's proposal achieved a parliamentary basis for him to.
Become prime minister (which is not synonymous with being able to “govern” applying his program), it could be a serious defeat of the French progressive option because from its approaches there are very few possibilities of achieving the application of its electoral proposals, which would result in greater citizen disappointment with the advance of the anti-politics that nourishes the fascist proposals. Let us therefore go to both documents, particularly to the “Programme” of chapters, in relation to the points on which I want to express doubts or disagreements, for what is said and for what is not said, as well as for the specific discrepancies expressed. for each organization that makes up the French coalition. Some issues, such as retirement at age 60, are raised without a proposal for a profound tax reform that would allow their application. Others point to a serious ignorance of the meaning of social relations (of “class struggle”), as could be implied by establishing by law (not by agreement resulting from collective bargaining and the consequent social mobilization) various issues: the right to veto of the works council for employment regulation files, the 35-hour work week (through the.